The Fifth Column Forum
Not logged in [Login - Register]
Go To Bottom

Printable Version  
Author: Subject: Nato part deux
ARH
Super Administrator
*********




Posts: 595
Registered: 10-5-2017
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 20-3-2019 at 01:05 PM
Nato part deux


The latest foot in mouth episode with Erdogan had me thinking, a great deal of the dynamics of alliances is caused by decades of inertia. If you had to recreate a new North Atlantic alliance today, which countries would you leave in or want to incorporate, and which would be left out?



Repent!

The darkest hour of Humanity is upon us. The world
shall meet it's end and we shall be submerged into a
new dark age. Repent your sins, for the apocalypse,
and the end, is extremely f@#king nigh!
View user's profile View All Posts By User
bug2
Member





Posts: 12270
Registered: 13-8-2017
Location: Perth
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 20-3-2019 at 01:26 PM


Include - most of Eastern Europe with the exception of Serbia. All of Scandinavia, including all the Baltic States, Finland and Sweden. All of mainland Europe as is...........

Exclude - no one.
View user's profile View All Posts By User
DEW
Member





Posts: 180
Registered: 11-11-2017
Member Is Offline


[*] posted on 20-3-2019 at 01:42 PM


Quote: Originally posted by bug2  
Include - most of Eastern Europe with the exception of Serbia. All of Scandinavia, including all the Baltic States, Finland and Sweden. All of mainland Europe as is...........

Exclude - no one.


All the time remembering that the ones you leave out you deliver to, or create an opportunity for, the opponent.

There lies the conundrum with Turkey. Short of regime change, at what point do you decouple, knowing the strategic opportunities you will create?
View user's profile View All Posts By User

  Go To Top

Powered by XMB 1.9.11
XMB Forum Software © 2001-2017 The XMB Group
[Queries: 16] [PHP: 27.5% - SQL: 72.5%]